Tren Penelitian Penatagunaan Tanah dalam Kebijakan Pertanahan: Analisis Bibliometrik dari Perspektif Negara Berkembang

Dani Lukmito Utomo

doi:10.31292/jta.v8i3.477

Authors

Dani Lukmito Utomo Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Buleleng, Bali, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v8i3.477

Keywords:

Bibliometrik, Kebijakan Pertanahan, Negara Berkembang, Penatagunaan Tanah

Abstract

This study aims to map scientific trends and global collaboration dynamics in land use studies in land policy, with a focus on developing countries. Using a bibliometric approach to 124 Scopus-indexed scientific articles during the period 2015–2025, the analysis was conducted using the Bibliometrix package in R Studio software. The results show a significant increase in the number of publications, especially since 2020, but this trend has not been accompanied by a commensurate increase in scientific impact. The most prominent central themes include “land management,” “land tenure,” and “land use planning,” while interdisciplinary approaches linking land issues to climate change and sustainable development continue to strengthen. Countries such as the Netherlands and Ethiopia dominate scientific production and collaboration, reflecting the strengthening involvement of the Global South in the global land discourse. A systematic synthesis of 17 selected articles identified three priority research agendas for further study: analysis of polycentric governance models that synergize various systems and actors; causal measurement of the impacts and trade-offs between land certification programs, food security, and ecosystem integrity; and economic-political studies of geospatial technologies to prevent new forms of digital land grabbing. These research agendas are expected to facilitate the transition from mere land administration to transformative, adaptive, and equitable land governance for developing countries.

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memetakan tren keilmuan dan dinamika kolaborasi global dalam studi penatagunaan tanah dalam kebijakan pertanahan, dengan fokus pada negara berkembang. Menggunakan pendekatan bibliometrik terhadap 124 artikel ilmiah terindeks Scopus selama periode 2015–2025, analisis dilakukan dengan menggunakan Bibliometrix package pada perangkat lunak R Studio. Hasil menunjukkan peningkatan signifikan dalam jumlah publikasi, terutama sejak 2020, namun tidak diikuti oleh peningkatan dampak ilmiah yang sebanding. Tema sentral yang paling menonjol meliputi “land management”, “land tenure”, dan “land use planning”, sementara pendekatan lintas disiplin yang mengaitkan isu tanah dengan perubahan iklim dan pembangunan berkelanjutan terus menguat. Negara-negara seperti Belanda dan Etiopia tampil dominan dalam produksi dan kolaborasi ilmiah, mencerminkan penguatan keterlibatan Global South dalam wacana pertanahan global. Sintesis sistematis dari 17 artikel terpilih mengidentifikasi tiga agenda riset prioritas lanjutan: analisis model tata kelola polisentris yang menyinergikan berbagai sistem dan aktor, pengukuran secara kausal dampak dan trade-off antara program sertifikasi lahan, ketahanan pangan, dan integritas ekosistem, dan studi ekonomi-politik teknologi geospasial untuk mencegah jenis baru perampasan tanah secara digital. Agenda riset tersebut diharapkan dapat memfasilitasi transisi, dari hanya sekadar administrasi pertanahan, menjadi tata kelola pertanahan yang transformatif, adaptif, dan berkeadilan bagi negara berkembang.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul-Kareem, R., Gnansounou, S. C., & Adongo, R. (2021). Effects of the oil-find on land management in the Sekondi-Takoradi Metropolis, Western Coast of Ghana. Journal of Land Use Science, 16(4), 398–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2021.1991018

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Azadi, H., Robinson, G., Barati, A. A., Goli, I., Moghaddam, S. M., Siamian, N., Värnik, R., Tan, R., & Janečková, K. (2023). Smart Land Governance: Towards a Conceptual Framework. Land, 12(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12030600

Balas, M., Carrilho, J., & Lemmen, C. (2021). The Fit for Purpose Land Administration Approach-Connecting People, Processes and Technology in Mozambique. Land, 10(8), 818. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10080818

Barbier, E. B. (2004). Explaining Agricultural Land Expansion and Deforestation in Developing Countries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86(5), 1347–1353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0002-9092.2004.00688.x

Barbier, E. B., & Hochard, J. P. (2018). Land degradation and poverty. Nature Sustainability, 1(11), 623–631. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0155-4

Bodin, Ö. (2017). Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science, 357(6352). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan1114

Chan, F. K. S., Chen, J., Li, P., Wang, J., Wang, J., & Zhu, Y. (2023). The cross-boundary of land degradation in Mongolia and China and achieving its neutrality - challenges and opportunities. Ecological Indicators, 151, 110311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110311

Chehrehbargh, F. J., Rajabifard, A., Atazadeh, B., & Steudler, D. (2024). Current challenges and strategic directions for land administration system modernisation in Indonesia. Journal of Spatial Science, 69(4), 1097–1130. https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2024.2360531

Chen, S., Song, Y., Shu, F., & Larivière, V. (2022). Interdisciplinarity and impact: the effects of the citation time window. Scientometrics, 127(5), 2621–2642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04338-1

Chigbu, U. E., Schopf, A., de Vries, W. T., Masum, F., Mabikke, S., Antonio, D., & Espinoza, J. (2017). Combining land-use planning and tenure security: a tenure responsive land-use planning approach for developing countries. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60(9), 1622–1639. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1245655

Chipenda, C. (2022). The social and cultural dynamics of Zimbabwe’s land reform programme on the ‘new generation’ of farmers: a transformative social policy perspective. African Identities, 20(3), 265–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725843.2020.1813553

Choi, C. S., Siregar, I. Z., & Ravi, S. (2020). Reframing the Competition for Land between Food and Energy Production in Indonesia (pp. 241–260). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43973-6_11

Dagne, H., Assefa, E., & Teferi, E. (2023). Sustainable Use of Soil and Water Conservation Technologies and Its Determinants: The Case of the Handosha Watershed, Omo-Gibe River Basin, Ethiopia. Earth (Switzerland), 4(2), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.3390/earth4020017

Delphin, S., Snyder, K. A., Tanner, S., Musálem, K., Marsh, S. E., & Soto, J. R. (2022). Obstacles to the Development of Integrated Land-Use Planning in Developing Countries: The Case of Paraguay. Land, 11(8), 1339. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11081339

Ding, Y., & Luo, Q. (2024). Polycentric spatial Structure, digital economy and urban green sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 468, 143080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143080

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133(March), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Freshwater, D., Sherwood, G., & Drury, V. (2006). International research collaboration. Journal of Research in Nursing, 11(4), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987106066304

Haley, A., Alemu, S. K., Zerihun, Z., & Uusimäki, L. (2024). Internationalisation through research collaboration. Educational Review, 76(4), 675–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2022.2054958

Hamann, M., Biggs, R., & Reyers, B. (2015). Mapping social–ecological systems: Identifying ‘green-loop’ and ‘red-loop’ dynamics based on characteristic bundles of ecosystem service use. Global Environmental Change, 34, 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.07.008

He, X., Xiang, B., Xu, Z., & Yu, D. (2025). Exploring the evolution and collaboration in two-sided matching: a comprehensive bibliometric and topic modeling analysis. International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics, 18(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJICC-08-2024-0374

Hoefsloot, F. I., & Gateri, C. (2024). Contestation, negotiation, and experimentation: The liminality of land administration platforms in Kenya. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. https://doi.org/10.1177/02637758241254943

Kleemann, J., Inkoom, J. N., Thiel, M., Shankar, S., Lautenbach, S., & Fürst, C. (2017). Peri-urban land use pattern and its relation to land use planning in Ghana, West Africa. Landscape and Urban Planning, 165, 280–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.02.004

Kuhn, T. K., Oinonen, S., Trentlage, J., Riikonen, S., Vikström, S., & Burkhard, B. (2021). Participatory systematic mapping as a tool to identify gaps in ecosystem services research: insights from a Baltic Sea case study. Ecosystem Services, 48, 101237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101237

Kusuma, A. F., Sahide, M. A. K., Purwanto, R. H., Ismariana, E., Santoso, W. B., Wulandari, E., & Maryudi, A. (2023). Emergent Institutional Issues from New Tenure Reforms and Social-Forestry Initiatives in Indonesia: Notes from The Field. Forest and Society, 7(2), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v7i2.28319

Kwiek, M. (2015). The Internationalization of Research in Europe. Journal of Studies in International Education, 19(4), 341–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315315572898

le Polain de Waroux, Y., Garrett, R. D., Chapman, M., Friis, C., Hoelle, J., Hodel, L., Hopping, K., & Zaehringer, J. G. (2021). The role of culture in land system science. Journal of Land Use Science, 16(4), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/1747423X.2021.1950229

Nyandwi, E., Koeva, M., Kohli, D., & Bennett, R. (2019). Comparing human versus machine-driven cadastral boundary feature extraction. Remote Sensing, 11(14), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11141662

Papaskiri, T. V, Burov, M. P., Ananicheva, E. P., Shevchuk, A. A., & Popova, E. S. (2021). Information and technological support of digital land management. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 867(1), 012174. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/867/1/012174

Pinuji, S., de Vries, W. T., Rineksi, T. W., & Wahyuni, W. (2023). Is Obliterated Land Still Land? Tenure Security and Climate Change in Indonesia. Land, 12(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020478

Putri, N. A., Sarmilah, S., Velda, J., & Zschock, W. M. (2024). Bridging the Gap by Exploring Inequalities in Access to Land and Disparities in Agrarian Law in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.19184/jik.v5i1.47416

Sklenicka, P. (2016). Classification of farmland ownership fragmentation as a cause of land degradation: A review on typology, consequences, and remedies. Land Use Policy, 57, 694–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.032

Snilstveit, B., Vojtkova, M., Bhavsar, A., Stevenson, J., & Gaarder, M. (2016). Evidence & Gap Maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 79, 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.05.015

Susman, R., Gütte, A. M., & Weith, T. (2021). Drivers of land use conflicts in infrastructural mega projects in coastal areas: A case study of patimban seaport, indonesia. Land, 10(6), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060615

Waeterloos, E. (2021). Introducing Collaborative Governance in Decentralized Land Administration and Management in South Africa: District Land Reform Committees Viewed through a ‘System of Innovation’ Lens. Land, 10(5), 534. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10050534

Winarno, W. W., Purwanti, A., Kristiana, D. R., & Wahyuni, E. S. (2023). Penelitian Kualitatif menggunakan Systematic Literature Review (1st ed.). UPP STIM YKPN.